Published Thursday, February 13, 2025
You’ve been here before.
Standing in the kitchen. Dishes in the sink. Trash still sitting by the door.
“Hey, I asked you to take out the trash.”
Your child barely looks up. “I’ll do it later.”
Your jaw tightens. It’s the tenth time today you’ve heard that.
Later never comes.
“Now,” you say, firmer.
They sigh. Roll their eyes. “Why do you always freak out about stupid stuff?”
And just like that—you snap.
"That’s it. Give me your phone."
Now you’ve got their attention. But did you actually fix the problem?
Myth: phone removal teaches discipline. Reality: research suggests it often leads to secrecy rather than responsibility.
Myth: phone removal teaches discipline. Reality: research suggests it often leads to secrecy rather than responsibility.
On the surface, taking away your child’s phone seems like an effective way to discipline.
They misbehave. > They lose their device.
Simple, right?
It’s immediate. It’s effective. It gets a reaction.
But here’s the problem.
Their cell phone isn’t just a device—it’s their world.
There is a need for balanced digital habits for everyone in the family. After all, kidslearn phone use behaviors by watching their parents.
There is a need for balanced digital habits for everyone in the family. After all, kids learn phone use behaviors by watching their parents.
📲 It’s their connection to friends.
📲 Their social life.
📲 Their entertainment, their escape.
📲 Sometimes, even their homework assignment.
When parents take the phone away for an unrelated mistake, it’s no longer about teaching responsibility. It’s about control.
Research backs this up.
A study published in the Journal of Research on Adolescence found that harsh discipline—especially when unrelated to the behavior—leads to higher rates of defiance, secrecy, and emotional withdrawal (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2016).
📌 Translation?
Taking away your child’s phone won’t make them more responsible—it will make them better at going behind your back.
Taking their phone shouldn’t be a go-to punishment for “problematic behavior.”
📌 Short answer? Maybe—but with a better strategy than just locking it up.
Screen time before bed can negatively affect sleep quality, mental health, and overall well-being.
A study from the Journal of Pediatrics found that teens who use their phone within 30 minutes of bedtime have:
When parents take the phone away for an unrelated mistake, it’s no longer about teaching responsibility. It’s about control.
The Screen Time 3-Space shows that phone use isn’t inherently bad—its impact depends on how interactive, educational, and socially engaging the activity is.
The Screen Time 3-Space shows that phone use isn’t inherently bad—its impact depends on how interactive, educational, and socially engaging the activity is.
It’s not screen time that messes with sleep—it’s what you’re doing on the screen.
A study published in Sleep Medicine found that actively engaging with stimulating content before bed—like social media, gaming, or emotionally charged videos—leads to higher arousal and worse sleep quality.
But? Passive phone use—like listening to music or reading on a dimly lit screen—had little to no negative effects on sleep. (Read the study)
📌 Translation? The phone itself isn’t the villain. The activity is what matters.
This is why a blanket ban on phones at night doesn’t always make sense. It’s not about cutting them off from technology completely—it’s about helping them make better choices with it.
Which is why taking their phone at night shouldn’t feel like a punishment.
Because the goal isn’t control. It’s balance.
And when rules feel fair, kids are way more likely to follow them.
Yes, excessive phone use before bed can be a problem.
But banning it completely? That could create more harm than good.
Why?
Because their phone isn’t just entertainment—it’s their lifeline to their social world.
Imagine this:
It’s midnight and your teen is having an anxiety attack.
They want to talk to their best friend—but their phone is locked away.
Or a classmate needs help with a school project and they send an urgent message.
But your child doesn’t get it because phones are off-limits past 8 PM.
📌 Instead of taking it away, set limits that make sense:
📌 The goal isn’t to punish phone use—it’s to teach balance.
Great question. When do parents stop controlling their child’s phone use?
📌 The answer isn’t about age. It’s about responsibility.
If your kid:
Then taking their phone away shouldn’t be necessary.
But if they:
Then it makes sense to set limits—even at 16 or 17.
📌 Parenting isn’t about control. It’s about preparing them for the real world.
Instead of thinking about when to stop taking their phone, ask:
Because eventually, they’ll be on their own.
And they need to know how to navigate the digital world—without a parent enforcing the rules.
If you’re asking this question, you’re already thinking about it the right way.
📌 A 14-year-old isn’t a child—but they’re not an adult either.
Taking away a teen’s phone should be based on:
If your teen is using their phone to bully others, break rules, or avoid real responsibilities—taking it away might be necessary.
If they’re just having an attitude or forgot a chore—find a different consequence that makes sense.
The rule of thumb?
If the phone wasn’t the problem, it shouldn’t be the punishment.
Instead of blanket bans, the best approach is to implement flexible, balanced and realistic discipline strategies that work best for your family.
Instead of blanket bans, the best approach is to implement flexible, balanced and realistic discipline strategies that work best for your family.
Your kid messes up.
You’re frustrated.
Pause.
That eye roll? That attitude? It’s probably not about the trash.
Maybe they bombed a test. Maybe a friend embarrassed them. Maybe they’re overwhelmed.
📌 You don’t have to let it slide. But you do have to understand before you punish.
A simple question makes all the difference:
💬 “Hey, what’s going on? You don’t usually talk to me like that.”
Research from the American Psychological Association shows that teens who feel heard by their parents are more likely to respect rules—not out of fear, but because of trust (Smetana et al., 2014).
📌 Translation? Listening doesn’t mean letting them off the hook. It means actually fixing the behavior instead of just shutting it down.
Discipline should teach responsibility rather than control. Natural consequences are more effective than arbitrary punishments like taking away a child’s phone.
Discipline should teach responsibility rather than control. Natural consequences are more effective than arbitrary punishments like taking away a child’s phone.
Discipline has to make sense.
Real-world mistakes have real-world consequences. So should discipline.
This is how kids actually learn.
Dr. Beth Peters puts it best: "Taking away their phone for an unrelated mistake doesn’t teach responsibility. It just teaches them to be sneaky."
If the mistake happened on their phone—cyberbullying, breaking social media rules, misusing tech—then yes, phone privileges should be on the table.
But even then, explain why. Make the lesson clear.
One day, your child will be on their own.
No parent to set limits.
No one to take away their phone.
What will guide them then?
A study from Child Development found that kids who experience logical consequences (ones that actually connect to their actions) develop better self-control and decision-making skills as adults (Grusec & Goodnow, 1994).
📌 The goal isn’t obedience…it’s responsibility.
Good parenting isn’t about winning battles.
It’s about raising a child who makes the right choices—even when you’re not watching.
And that doesn’t happen by taking away a phone.
It happens through:
This statistic highlights the need for mindful digital parenting. Developing responsible tech habits, instead of blanket bans or total restrictions, is essential for guiding kids in the digital age.
This statistic highlights the need for mindful digital parenting. Developing responsible tech habits, instead of blanket bans or total restrictions, is essential for guiding kids in the digital age.
We live in a digital world.
A child’s phone isn’t just a luxury—it’s part of everyday life.
Taking away your child's phone isn’t the same as grounding them from TV in 1995.
Today, removing phone access can mean:
Does that mean parents should never take away a phone? No.
But many parents use it as a go-to punishment.
And that’s wrong.
Parenting in the digital age is hard.
Teens push back.
Technology complicates discipline.
Other parents will judge your choices.
But here’s what matters: Your goal isn’t just to correct behavior. It’s to raise a child who makes the right choices—even without punishment.
Next time you reach for their phone in frustration, pause.
Sometimes, taking away your child’s phone is the right move.
But do it with intention, not impulse.
Because when discipline is done right, it doesn’t just correct behavior.
It builds a child who can navigate life—without fear, without rebellion, and without you always needing to take something away.
Derek Jackson
I’m always chasing the next challenge—whether it’s deep in the woods, in the pages of a new book, or at the forefront of innovation. As a dad of three and an Army veteran, I’ve built a life around problem-solving, adaptability, and thinking ahead. Before co-founding Cyber Dive, I led a team of intelligence soldiers in analyzing and targeting ISIS and other radical insurgents who used social media to spread propaganda and recruit foreign fighters. Now, I’m bringing that same expertise to parents, cutting through the noise to give them the information they need—whether they’re ready for it or not.
Type 3 Achiever / INTP Logician
The internet moves fast—predators, loopholes, and digital dangers evolve daily. We track it all so you don’t have to.
No fluff. No fearmongering. Just the truth you need.
🔒 Join thousands of informed parents—sign up now.